One of the blind spots for the Left is that it is unable to
accept it could be a source of bigotry or racism. The Left is founded on the idea that it not
only has different pragmatic and economic solutions, but that to subscribe to certain
economic theories makes one morally superior.
The converse is also assumed, that however hard-working or diligent for
the country a conservative is, he is morally bad perhaps even evil. When coming into contact with decent conservatives,
to keep their world-view of their moral superiority holding together, the
Leftist will create some explanation, such as that this decent person has been
fooled into being a conservative and is really Left wing under the surface.
Yet a perusal of history clearly shows that ideas put
forward as progressive in every era have been responsible for more deaths, suffering,
hatred and poverty than conservatism ever has been. From
Robespierre’s Terror to the Stalinist Gulags,
to the economic catastrophe that is Socialist Venezuela (so admired by the
current leader of the British Labour Party) it is the Left that has been the
political movement most responsible for human suffering. Nonetheless, when self-righteousness is the
key foundation of one’s political involvement, it is an unthinkable thought
that one’s beliefs might be the cause of suffering for the people you claim to
help. Thus begins the search for a
scapegoat. It is impossible for the average
Leftist to take moral responsibility without his whole Weltanschauung and idea
of himself as morally superior to his contemporaries being fatally undermined.
In the Twentieth Century anti-semitism was more associated with
the Right and Jewish involvement in politics tended to be participation in Left
wing Marxism. If Nazism can be regarded
as right wing, which is debatable given its anti-conservative, revolutionary
and avante garde tendencies, that was of course the most egregious example of
right-wing anti-semitism. On the other
hand, as Solzhenitsyn has pointed out, the high level of Jewish involvement in
the Bolshevik movement was disproportionate in comparison to the number of Jewish
Russians. It is also worth mentioning
that the involvement of White Russian emigres seeking revenge through the
National Socialist movement in Germany is often overlooked.
Nonetheless, anti-semitism has a far more natural home with
the Left. Despite the terrible suffering
of the Jewish people most have refused to give in to a victim status that would
seem a natural default position given the extent of persecution. They have not become passive clients of a
Leftist narrative that feeds off resentment.
Of course many black people or other ethnic minorities refuse the
resentment narrative fed to the them by White Leftists, but the Jewish refusal
to give in to victimhood has been phenomenal and brave. They have succeeded as a community in keeping
their traditions alive (something intolerable to the anti-traditionalist Left)
and individual Jews have often reached the very top of Western society, giving
the lie to the Leftist narrative that our society is based on oppression,
rather than the hierarchies of competence identified by Jordan Peterson.
Therefore there are twofold reasons to choose the Jews as
scapegoats for the Left: first they have
refused to be compliant with the Marxist post-modern narrative of oppression by
a white Anglo-Saxon protestant-establishment.
Secondly, by succeeding in a capitalist system they have become part of
the oppressive conspiracy as set out in Left wing narrative. The irony is of course that not only Karl
Marx, but the founders of post-modernism or cultural Marxism were largely
Jewish. This Left wing involvement by
some Jews says more about the experience of lacking roots in a society than it
does about Western society itself. This was of course a very important point for the Jewish Catholic writer and philosopher Simone Weil.
Western culture is fundamentally Christian and that means
the Jewish religion and Scripture is a core part of our culture and values. We are a Judaeo Christian culture and it is
that culture that the cultural Marxists, post-moderns and Leftists seek to
destroy.
If Western culture is a conspiracy of the capitalist class
against the proletariat, it is a very fine line between making that claim and
stepping into a dark conspiracy theory about a certain race that is successful
in capitalism being behind globalist neoliberal economics.
Being anti-conservative, whether as an international or
national socialist or a post-modern, is about attacking the fundamental values
and the fabric of our Christian culture.
That is why Leftists can make common cause with those attacking
traditional gender roles and hard-line Islamists who believe in traditional
gender roles. It is not that these
different groups have a shared positive cause, they are simply enemies of the
Western inheritance. The Jews are
different – their great sin is to succeed as an ethnic minority in this
allegedly oppressive society. The Left has
not achieved a claim over their loyalty necessarily – they are not supplicants
to the morally-virtuous Left-wing politicians.
Of course this is a gross generalisation, but we must understand that
the Left thinks in gross generalisations.
All the way back to Marx, people are not individual persons, but members
of a class. They are reduced to being
part of an oppressor or victim class with their personal attributes erased in
the eyes of the ideologue. That of
course is very similar to racism.
It is therefore a very thin line between accepting the
Marxist narrative and slipping into anti-semitism. In the United States the dominance of
intersectional theories of oppression places Muslims as a group above
Jews. The problem of anti-semitism in
political Islam is therefore being overlooked.
In the United Kingdom the main Left-of-centre parliamentary party has
been taken over by Hard-Left anti-parliamentary economic Marxists. If you believe capitalism is a conspiracy against
the poor, it is a very small step to believing Jews are oppressing the
people. We are already seeing serious
problems with anti-semitism in the British Labour Party. The willingness of the American Democratic
party to see and hear no evil with regard to political Islam means they too are
starting to turn a blind eye to anti-semitism, despite the party’s strong connections
with the Jewish community in the United States.
What all this tells us is that the Left cannot reform or be self-reflective
or critical unless it accepts being Left wing is not an infallible sign of
moral righteousness. Most politics is
just about the mechanics of achieving economic growth for as many people as
possible and ensuring civil society survives.
There are different theories as to how this might be done – from wealth
creation and trickle-down economics to redistributive taxation. The moral choice is not whether one is Left
or Right, but whether one participates at all.
As long as there is this blindness about its own moral fallibility, the
Left will fail to confront its own festering demons of anti-semitism and bigotry.
No comments:
Post a Comment