The Deputy President of Britain’s new Supreme Court, Lady
Hale (who calls herself “Miss Diversity”) was one of five judges who dismissed
the appeal of Christian guesthouse owners previously found to be in breach of
equality law for turning away a homosexual couple from their own bed and
breakfast.
The victims of Britain’s legal system, for they are
undoubtedly victims, Mr and Mrs Bull, refused to allow two homosexual men to
share a room. They were of course
running the guesthouse according to their own principles. The homosexual couple were under no
obligation to stay at the bed and breakfast at all. They instead chose to victimise a Christian couple, using
British Law as the means by which they bullied and persecuted them.
The couple have now had to close their guesthouse, following
the controversy, which led to them being victims of vandalism and having their
website hacked. Whether one shares
the views of this couple or not, anyone who has an ounce of decency or any inkling
of justice and fairness must be outraged by the decision of our nation’s most
senior judges.
There are of course different interpretations of the Bible’s
teaching on homosexuality. For
example, some believe Saint Paul’s unequivocal condemnation is actually an
attack on forms of pagan licentiousness, rather than condemning two people of
the same-sex being in a long-term relationship. To read Scripture as condemning all forms of homosexuality
is not however to adopt some strange or absurd reading of Scripture – it is a
pretty straightforward response to the text.
Since the Glorious Revolution we have nurtured a political
settlement that is based on pluralism of denominations and the acceptance that
people interpret the Bible differently.
This attack by our legal system on people acting in accordance with
their beliefs as to what the Bible says is an attack on liberty of conscience
and religious pluralism. How can
we claim to be a Christian country when this sort of injustice has occurred?
Of course, some will argue that it is all very well holding
your own beliefs, but in terms of offering a service to the public, one should
not discriminate against members of the public who live their lives contrary to
your beliefs.
Well, a guesthouse is surely not quite the same as selling
goods in a shop. The guesthouse is
in that grey area of being a private home offered up as a public house. Surely there must be sensitivity
towards people’s scruples when the house in which one is choosing to stay is
their house?
People are not homophobic if they object to same-sex couples
sleeping together in their own home!
They have every right to bar people from anything in their own
homes. The blogger believes that
right over your home should also apply to your guesthouse.
Miss Diversity as Lady Hale calls herself, claims that Mr
and Mrs Bull’s offering of separate rooms to the visitors in their own guesthouse was “an
affront to their dignity as human beings”. Actually the real disrespect was shown by the homosexual couple, when they made demands as to
what they should be able to do on someone else’s property. We hear a lot about discrimination and
equality legislation nowadays; there is a much older principle our judges
should remember and that is: “An
Englishman’s home is his castle”!
I totally agree Matthew. This decision is appalling, and a real travesty of justice!
ReplyDelete