Western Churches in their rather ineffectual and half-hearted
attempt to resist the sexualisation of our society (sometimes turning into their
full abject surrender to the agenda) are often accused of being obsessed by sex. Of course the real problem for the churches
is they are trying to survive and perhaps even rescue the sinners in an age
dominated by sexualisation. It is
becoming all the more apparent that in the 1960s there was not so much a social
and sexual revolution as a major project in social engineering directed by
elites in power.
The CIA now acknowledges its own involvement in the cultural
revolution of the 1960s with the MK Ultra project encouraging drug usage and in
other manipulation with the promotion of abstract art against traditional forms, by supporting artists such as Jackson Pollock, or in promoting radical politics such as backing Frankfurt School philosopher Herbert Marcuse. In terms of drug usage, sexualisation of
society and feminism it seems highly likely the CIA was generally involved. Ostensibly
this was to present a Western society as “free” and avante garde in contrast to
the Soviet Union’s oppressive restrictions and its Soviet realism in art. While the early USSR had been extreme in its
social progressivism after the Revolution, this changed during the Great
Patriotic War. Stalin, party to the
original social liberalisation, recognised to win the War and defeat the Nazi
threat he needed to give people access to their churches again, bring a halt to
abortions and homosexuality and restore some level of traditional values again. For pragmatic reasons, the Soviet Union had
dispensed with the path to moral degeneracy; in a couple of decades time, the
West fully embarked upon moral degeneracy during the 1960s.
There was perhaps more to it than merely a good propaganda
opportunity to present the United States as the land of the free. On both sides of the Atlantic, elite intellectuals
shared certain progressive ideals often meant to be achieved by sinister
methods. Eliminating religious faith,
sexual liberation, feminism, eugenics and an all-powerful State were the ideals
of the Transatlantic elites. Important families
- the Rockafellas, the Rothschilds, the
Huxleys, the Darwins were part of an elite linked to progressivism. The Fabian idea of a slow technocratic revolution
promoted by the Webbs, H G Wells’ vision of a new world, Betrand Russell’s dry
atheism, all were complementary to each other in an overarching elite and anti-Christian
idea of progress. Valiant opponents
spoke out such as G K Chesterton, C S Lewis via his novels, even George Orwell from
a non-traditional perspective. What is sometimes
overlooked is the fascination with the occult sitting alongside commitment to atheism
and a religious scientism amongst these elites.
Secret societies were popular.
There was undoubtedly an elite agenda following in the tradition of the Eighteenth
Century Enlightenment, secret societies and the French and American Revolutions.
It is important to understand that atomisation and Socialist
Revolution go hand in hand. The real technocratic
Socialism of Wells, Mr and Mrs Webb or Russell, rather than the small s
socialism of a Schumacher. And we should
not be too distracted by Socialism, an ideology that has probably served its
purposes – one of which was to violently destroy Holy Rus and another to
achieve a type of Benthamite panoptican.
An obsession with free love, population control and elite power were the
Babel preoccupations of the Western elites at the beginning of the last Century. A brave new one- world government would be
achieved by the elites managing the talking monkeys (a degraded view of Man and
rejection of Man as the imago dei).
Combined with this were to come structural economic changes
that created an opportunity to implement the final revolution. As capitalism moved from its Fordist stage
which had been aided by social engineering to replace the extended family by
the nuclear family, the capitalists in the late Twentieth Century now needed
dislocated individuals, they needed women in the workplace and a certain cosmopolitan
rootlessness as capitalism in the West became global, factories moved abroad,
migrants were brought in as labour. In
the Post War era manufacturing’s time in the West was limited. It was not only militant unions that destroyed
industry.
Throughout the sixties Governments still obviously dominated
by liberal elites passed laws that “liberated” or atomised us. Instead of living a life in a context of traditional
values and responsibilities we were encouraged by legal changes and engineered
popular culture to think what was good was what was pleasurable and aided my
passions and appetites. Homosexuality
and abortion were legalised. Divorce was
made easy. In America elite liberals had
pushed for the creation of an effective contraceptive to break people from the
responsibilities of child bearing (an early transhumanist move). This further facilitated the shifting
of women out of the family home and into the workplace, usually into lowly jobs trying to find money for childcare. Racial
hatred laws were introduced for what would be the inevitable future multiculturalism
of an increasingly global capitalism based on shifting cheap labour from poorer
countries into richer countries. They would
be a means to prevent discontent boiling over in the face of mass migration. Whatever the merits of such laws, they were
drafted with an eye on the plans for the future.
Most central to everything was the sexual relationship. If the most personal and sacred encounter
between two people, the act at once most intimately physical and spiritually
unifying could be extracted from the sacramental union of marriage and taken
out of the family home and was no longer between two spouses, but rather made casual, then alienation and atomisation would be achieved.
The powerful elites, with their occultist interests and their Darwinian
reduction of men to mere intelligent apes saw the power of sexual desire. If taken off the yoke of social taboos unrestrained
sexual desire would create a new race who could never really connect, who were
driven by their passions, which they felt it was their right to sate. Harm between persons and distrust would turn
us into the isolated individuals subject to anomie and self-loathing, but preoccupied
with our rights, and the technocrats knew they would be able to control people thus demoralised. We would become exactly the sort of alienated
and isolated individuals that would be passive in the face of an ever
encroaching progressive system.
Furthermore if deviant relationships could be promoted, the family would
be undermined, the greatest bulwark as Chesterton pointed out against the oppressive
State.
Another development was in the elite’s favour – the invention
of television. The visual image is far
more powerful than the spoken word of radio (already a propaganda tool). Serials with popular characters were written
pulling at the heart strings to make radical changes in what was socially
acceptable achievable. The social revolutionary
themes of freemason Mozart’s operas entered popular culture with narratives of
oppressive patriarchs being ridiculed. The
propaganda would develop to actively promote what was once seen as taboo in
sitting rooms across the country, via that glowing, talking box. With the removal of the Lord Chamberlain’s
role television could be used to push boundaries of taboos until unwittingly a
conservative society would become liberal.
In America former propagandist Edward Bernays had already utilised the
social-engineering potential of advertising.
And so the elites who long planned this seem to have
achieved their goal. The bread and
circuses of entertainment, sexual promiscuity, LGBT, and the impact of feminism
have all helped towards Malthusian goals of population reduction. People are unable to think as they focus on
consumption. Churches are in
decline. Marriage is in decline. These are the very aims of those Occultist
progressives at the start of the Century.
What is more they cannot tolerate the survival
of any foreign government not fully on board with the revolution of “liberation”.
International tensions are therefore
escalated to pressurise countries to abandon not only economic freedom from
debt to globalist institutions, but also their traditional values. Western NGOs are often focused not only on
protecting human beings from oppressive regimes, but more on promoting the new subverted
values of the revolutionary West. So
much so that the six-coloured banner of LGBTQ+ has come to be seen as a flag of
globalist imperialism in many non-Western countries.
The “rights” of sexual freedom, from heterosexual promiscuity
to LGBT are now being used to increase the reach of the Panoptican, so that
speech is suppressed if it makes a case for a return to traditional
values. The surveillance system via the
State and Big Tech is the other side of the revolutionary coin to the “rights”
rhetoric. And so in the name of freedom
not only have we been enslaved to our passions and appetites, isolated and
atomised, but we have lost the freedom to speak out and question the agenda
imposed by long-established families and secret societies that are in their
deepest beliefs hostile to God, the Church and Tradition.
